Analyze and discuss the article The Case for Contamination by Kwame Essay

Analyze and discuss the word The Case for Contamination by Kwame Anthony Appiah (from a religious perspective) - Essay ExampleIn this regard, I commit it is important to understand the differences between religious and cultural beliefs, alternatively than to quickly gloss them over in favor of a unitarian belief that ignores the actual teachings of the religions themselves. For example, by learning the specific characteristics of Islam - submission, prayer, fasting, pilgrimage, etc. and instinct them historic tout ensembley as they relate to the development of unique schools of thought, ritual, and practice, we roll in the hay understand the religion in a way that truly appreciates it as a cultural value ashes. What may appear as legal jointure in post-modern society can result in a further weakening of religion. This can be turn overed as a modernization of religious belief, but it also illustrates the way that secular values can dilute and destroy religious diversity by po sing all ideas in a supermarket of choices where all philosophies are packaged and sold equally, to anybody, but nobody really cares what is on the inside of the box. Thus, this essay testament review the position of Kwame Anthony Appiah in the NYT article The Case for Contamination, analyzing the authors call for multicultural unity, spell searching for ways that this process can lead to greater understanding of religious diversity and uniqueness, rather than a dilution of religious belief into a secular paradigm dominated by the values of the marketplace. In the past couple of years, Unescos members have spent a great deal of time trying to prick out a convention on the protection and promotion of cultural diversity. (It was finally approved at the Unesco General Conference in October 2005.) The drafters worried that the processes of globalization. . .represent a challenge for cultural diversity, namely in view of risks of imbalances between rich and poor countries. The fear is that the values and images of Western mass culture, like some trespassing(a) weed, are threatening to choke out the worlds native flora. (Appiah, 2006) Appiah defines the position that he is reacting to as related to the UNESCO determination of the protection and promotion of cultural diversity. Appiah chides UNESCO, as if there really is no threat to indigenous culture, as if we were really not losing our cultural diversity globally in a manner similar to and operate by the same modern economic forces that has caused us to lose our natural biodiversity. The protection of endangered species and biodiversity is an lengthiness and continuation of the protection of cultural diversity through multiculturalism. These two are joined in activism and in sharing a philosophical foundation. What Appiah posits as his ideal in contrast to traditional values is Cosmopolitanism, and in doing so I am afraid that he elevates the superficial aspects of the modern economic and social system to an undeserved place as an ideal. Traditional religious belief systems contain feudal, primitive, and even pre-historic aspects of our cultural heritage, with Buddhist teachings, the Vedas, and the Bible going back to the earliest days of recorded